Idealization and reality beyond good man

 IDEALIZATION AND REALITY BEYOND GOOD MAN

Author: Naeemullah samejo

ABSTRACT 

                    In idealization we believe that some people who are good in their actual means but people think something wrong against them. Those people face a lot of hurdles and challenges to survive. Idealization is the practice of forming ideas or living under their influence. We end up with only a mental world. Such philosophers are called idealists. Idealism- the belief that reality is essentially idea and mind rather than matter. . Few people exhibits themselves as a good man but when we observe them internally or more about them we come to know about their actual existence. A good man will never suspect his friends of shady actions: this is part of his goodness. A good man will never be suspected by the public of using his goodness to screen villains: this is part of his utility. It is clear that this combination of qualities makes a good man extremely desirable wherever a somewhat narrow-minded public objects to the transference of public funds into the hands of the deserving rich ones. And a man should have all those qualities which a good should possess and should attain that types of qualities. A man should be optimistic and positive and all aspects of its attitude and its behaviour. Views of different philosopher laid down the idealization and the reality beyond the good man.

INTRODUCTION  

                             There are many types of peoples surviving their lives in this mortal world but few of them are good and some are bad man. But the actual reality beyond these two types of man is else. Few people exhibits themselves as a good man but when we observe them internally or more about them we come to know about their actual existence. They make their different faces at different places that all comes in our ideas we think by our own selves but the main review about idealization is that. In idealization we believe that some people who are good in their actual means but people think something wrong against them. Those people face a lot of hurdles and challenges to survive. Idealization is the practice of forming ideas or living under their influence. Something that is to be idealized. The attitude of a person who thinks/believes that, it is possible to live according to very high standards of behaviour attitudes and honesty. Idealism in western culture which is considered to be that ideas are only true reality Plato 428:347 B.C. Some philosophers believes that if we push our investigation of matter far enough, we end up with only a mental world. Such philosophers are called idealists. Idealism- the belief that reality is essentially idea and mind rather than matter. Idealism emphasizes the mental and spiritual, means of the people of different symbols.

OBJECTIVES  

                     In this we will come to know about the reality of a good man and the views of different philosophers about them. And what peoples have idealized beyond the reality of a good man.

LITERATURE REVIEW

                   Different authors have put their different concepts and views about them the reality of a good man and another type of peoples who are idealized one. According to researcher of time, we mean by a 'good' man. The ideally good man does not drink or smoke, avoids bad language, converses in the presence of men only exactly as he would if there were ladies present, attends church regularly, and holds the correct opinions on all subjects. He has a wholesome horror of wrongdoing, and realizes that it is our painful duty to castigate Sin. He has a still greater horror of wrong thinking, and considers it the business of the authorities to safeguard the young against those who question the wisdom of the views generally accepted by middle-aged successful citizens. Apart from his professional duties, at which he is assiduous, he spends much time in good works: he may encourage patriotism and military training; he may promote industry, sobriety, and virtue among wage-earners and their children by seeing to it that failures in these respects receive due punishment; he may be a trustee of a university and prevent an ill-judged respect for learning from allowing the employment of professors with subversive ideas. Above all, of course, his 'morals', in the narrow sense, must be irreproachable. It may be doubted whether a 'good' man, in the above sense, does, on the average, any more good than the other one  'bad' man. The same may be said of the ex-Kaiser, a deeply religious man, sincerely convinced, until his fall, that God was on his side, and (so far as researcher know) wholly free from personal vices. Yet it would be hard to name any man of our time who has done more to cause human misery. Among politicians good men have their uses, the chief of which is to afford a smoke-screen behind which others can carry on their activities unsuspected. A good man will never suspect his friends of shady actions: this is part of his goodness. A good man will never be suspected by the public of using his goodness to screen villains: this is part of his utility. It is clear that this combination of qualities makes a good man extremely desirable wherever a somewhat narrow-minded public objects to the transference of public funds into the hands of the deserving rich ones. To speak seriously: the standards of 'goodness' which are generally recognised by public opinion are not those which are calculated to make the world a happier place. This is due to a variety of causes, of which the chief is tradition, and the next most powerful is the unjust power of dominant classes. Primitive morality seems to have developed out of the notion of taboo; that is to say, it was originally purely superstitious, and forbade certain perfectly harmless acts (such as eating out of the chief's dish) on the supposed ground that they produced disaster by magical means. In this way there came to be prohibitions, which continued to have authority over people's feelings when the supposed reasons for them were forgotten. A considerable part of current morals is still of this sort: certain kinds of conduct produce emotions of horror, quite regardless of the question whether they have bad effects or not. A man should be regarded as 'good' if he is happy, expansive, generous and glad when others are happy; if so, a few peccadilloes should be regarded as of little importance. But a man who acquires a fortune by cruelty and exploitation should be regarded as at present we regard what is called an 'immoral' man; and he should be so regarded even if he goes to church regularly and gives a portion of his ill-gotten gains to public objects.

CONCLUSION 

                      As for as this topic is concern we came to know about the good man and an idealized person and the reality beyond the good man. According to researchers and philosophers of the time a good man should have all the good and positive qualities. An idealized good man is thought to be as or regarded as good when he is happy, expensive, generous and very glade when others are happy. And he is regarded as if he goes to mosque regularly or do good deeds and gives a portion to his ill-gotten gains to public objects. But a man who acquires a fortune by cruelty and exploitation should be regarded as at present we regard what is called immoral man and he should be so regarded.